GM+Driver+Data+Sharing+Class+Actions+Consolidated+in+Georgia
Multiple class action lawsuits filed against General Motors (GM) over the sharing of drivers’ data with third parties have been consolidated into a single case in the Northern District of Georgia. The lawsuits allege that GM violated privacy laws by collecting and sharing data from its vehicles without drivers’ consent.
Background
In 2020, GM announced a program that allowed third-party developers to access vehicle data, such as GPS location, speed, and fuel consumption. The program was intended to enable the development of new products and services for GM customers. However, concerns arose about the privacy implications of the data sharing. Drivers alleged that GM failed to obtain their informed consent before collecting and sharing their personal information. They also argued that GM’s privacy policies were not clear and allowed for the data to be used for unintended purposes.
Consolidation
Several class action lawsuits were filed against GM in different jurisdictions. To streamline the litigation process and avoid duplicative proceedings, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated the cases into a single federal lawsuit. The case is now pending before Judge William S. Duffey Jr. in the Northern District of Georgia.
Allegations
The consolidated complaint alleges a variety of claims against GM, including: * Violation of the Driver Privacy Act (DPA) * Breach of fiduciary duty * Breach of contract * Negligence The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as an injunction to prevent GM from further sharing their data without consent.
GM’s Response
GM has denied any wrongdoing and has filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The company argues that it has a legitimate business interest in collecting and sharing data to improve its products and services. GM also maintains that it obtained consent from drivers through its privacy policies and terms of service.
Next Steps
The case is currently in the discovery phase, where both parties are exchanging evidence. The judge has scheduled a discovery deadline for July 2023 and a trial date for February 2024. The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for the privacy rights of drivers and the future of data sharing in the automotive industry.Centralization of Lawsuits Against General Motors for Sharing Customer Data
Centralization of Lawsuits Against General Motors for Sharing Customer Data
Multiple proposed class action lawsuits alleging that General Motors (GM) shared customers’ driving data with insurers without their consent have been consolidated in a federal court in Georgia. The centralization order encompasses seven such lawsuits, which also name OnStar LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc. as defendants. The lawsuits claim that the defendants collected and sold driver data, including location, speed, and driving habits, to insurance companies without the drivers’ explicit consent. This alleged data sharing is said to have resulted in higher insurance premiums for drivers who did not knowingly opt in to share their information. The lawsuits allege violations of federal and state privacy laws. Several other pending lawsuits related to this matter were not included in the consolidation order. The US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated these cases for pretrial proceedings to streamline discovery, reduce duplicative efforts, and promote efficient case management.
GM+Driver+Data+Sharing+Class+Actions+Consolidated+in+Georgia
Three class action lawsuits against General Motors (GM) alleging the company shared personal data from its OnStar service with third parties without consent have been consolidated into a single case in the Northern District of Georgia. The consolidated case, styled as
In re: General Motors, LLC OnStar Driver Data Privacy Litigation
, includes complaints filed in California, Illinois, and Michigan. The plaintiffs allege that GM violated the Driver Privacy Act and state privacy laws by sharing their driving data with third parties, including insurance companies and marketers, without their consent. GM has denied the allegations, arguing that it only shares data with third parties with the consent of its customers. The company has also stated that it takes privacy seriously and has implemented robust security measures to protect customer data. The consolidation of the three lawsuits is expected to streamline the litigation process and reduce the burden on the parties involved. The case is currently in the early stages of discovery, and a trial date has not yet been set. The outcome of the consolidated case could have significant implications for the auto industry and the privacy of vehicle owners. If the plaintiffs are successful, GM could be held liable for damages and be required to change its data-sharing practices. The case could also set a precedent for future privacy lawsuits against automakers and other companies that collect data from vehicles.
